AT&T Chat 'N Talk: Getting to Know You without
Getting to Know All About You
Interpersonal communication is one of the driving forces behind
the success of the Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). The popularity
of e-mail, bulletin board systems, chat rooms, and instant messaging suggest
that the exchange of information "online" is here to stay. The variety of
communication options and the nature of the Web support direct communication
between people with on-going relationships as well as providing opportunities
for strangers to establish relationships. One of the primary means
of meeting on the Web is via chat rooms. AT&T Chat 'N Talk is an innovative
application that provides Internet chat room users with a way to connect
by phone without revealing their phone number or identity. This allows users
to take the next step toward an ongoing relationship while maintaining a
level of anonymity and privacy. The call flow of AT&T Chat 'N Talk violates
the typical model of establishing communication events. This leads to some
limitations in usability and usefulness, for which solutions are discussed.
Communication is one of the driving forces behind the success
of the Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). Communication is broadly defined
as the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information that supports relationships
that are new, old, business-related or personal. E-mail, bulletin boards,
chat rooms and instant messaging provide the main mechanisms for interpersonal
communication on the Web today. Taken together, these new methods of communication
have fundamentally changed how we communicate, with whom we communicate, and
when we communicate.
Web sites and electronic commerce support the exchange of information
24 hours a day. E-mail has revived the art of letter writing and transformed
the way we work in global organizations. Bulletin board systems and news groups
support communities of interest in which the success of the community rest
on our ability to contribute to conversations spanning time and space. MUDs
and MOOs create contexts for fantasy and play behind a mask of anonymity and
disguise. Chat and Instant Messaging support our need for immediacy in our
communications, while Buddy List systems diminish our isolation by letting
us know that our "friends" are out there somewhere. The
data surrounding the affects of Internet relationships maintained via these
communication methods are not all in (Kraut, et al 1998; Hamman 1999; Katz,
et al 1997; Rheingold, 1998) , but the phenomenal popularity of online communication
services suggests that whatever changes are being wrought are here to stay.
There is considerable overlap in the use of these communication methods
in a given situation. For example, many chat programs allow a person to send
a private "instant message" to other participants in the room; a sequence of
instant messages between "buddies" may lead to a more extended e-mail conversation,
or even a phone call. The boundaries between these "on-line" forms of communication
and other forms such as paging, voice mail, and telephony are becoming more
fluid as users become more familiar with each, and as the underlying technology
migrates toward an IP (Internet Protocol) platform. For example, it is now possible
to get paged when an e-mail message is received, and to access that e-mail message
over the phone. As the boundaries blur, the usability of these communications
methods will depend on how well integrated the different capabilities appear
to the user.
At the crux of Internet communications are the issues of privacy (Schneier
& Banisar, 1997; Agre & Rotenberg, 1997; Kling, 1996) and establishing
trust (Rheingold 1993; Dibbell, 1983, 1999; Hafner, 1997). The discussion of
privacy on the Internet (or in an Internet-based world) is wide-ranging and
complex. The main issues center on the ability of users to send information
in ways that prevent eavesdropping--i.e., encryption--(Hoffman & Carreiro,
1997) and the ability of corporations, the government, or individuals to collect
and (ab)use information about users, including demographic and identifying information
supplied by the user, as well as information collected via "cookies"
that track the activities of users as they browse the WWW (Cranor & Reagle,
1997; Lin & Loui, 1998). The privacy of e-mail has received a great deal
of attention during the Microsoft anti-trust trial (Meeks, 1999). Issues of
trust surface at both the corporate level (Cheskin Research & Studio Archetype/Sapient,
1999) and the personal (Dibbell, 1999). Privacy issues have added relevance
to a service like AT&T Chat 'N Talk, because of the social context in which
such a service is likely to be used.
Both privacy issues and communication integration issues are critical
to the AT&T Chat 'N Talk service, a call-back service that allows chat room
participants to shift from a text interaction to a phone call without exchanging
their phone numbers. AT&T Chat 'N Talk is an interesting example of how
communication services are being developed for the Internet in the late 1990's.
The social context and the underlying technology have implications for the usability
and usefulness of the service. We will discuss the way in which we have addressed
The Context for AT&T Chat 'N Talk
A Brief Description
Imagine that you are in an Internet chat room where the topic of conversation is genealogy. You participate in the ensuing conversation by typing in your comments and replies. Based on the conversation, you determine that one of the people you have been chatting with may possess information you have been looking for that would help fill in some of the missing pieces of your family tree. At this point in the conversation you feel like you want to talk to the person on the phone but you are reluctant to give your unlisted phone number to your new Internet friend.
You click a button on your chat screen labeled "Phone" which provides a way for you to set up a regular telephone call without either party exposing their telephone numbers.
Figure 1 is a cartoon depiction of the AT&T Chat 'N Talk Service.
While in a chat room, chat participants decide that they would like to talk
on the phone. Each participant enters in his or her own phone number via the
Internet and triggers the phone connection. The phone calls are carried over
the traditional, high-quality voice network. This occurs when an element called
the "Call Broker" causes a conference bridge in the traditional phone
network to place calls to both endpoints. Caller ID is blocked and a "dummy"
phone number appears on the bill. Thus, the phone numbers of the participants
are never revealed.
Figure 1: Cartoon depiction of AT&T Chat 'N Talk Service.
The Social Context
As the example indicates, the social context for the
use of a service like AT&T Chat 'N Talk is a chat room, and what would compel
a chat participant to use the service is that he or she wants to increase the
level of intimacy with another participant. In
many cases, the level of discussion in chat rooms is impoverished rich enough
to indicate that you d like to know more about a person, but not rich enough
to really follow through with acquiring that knowledge. The
medium of Chat hides (or allows one to hide) a lot of important information
about a person: gender, age, etc. Much of this information becomes apparent
when the person's voice is heard.
Two privacy issues are particularly important in the chat-to-talk
context. One issue concerns the fact that many chat rooms are devoted to salacious
topics, as well as to self-help or group support topics. Users may find it particularly
desirable to protect their anonymity in such situations. In this case, the user
would prefer to protect his or her privacy at the system level. A second,
and more personal, privacy issue is the one that drives the need for a service
like AT&T Chat 'N Talk: Privacy about who you are and how to get in touch
with you is very important to people, especially in a world where anyone who
knows your phone number can use it to discover your real name and find a map
to your house. The level of privacy that AT&T Chat 'N
Talk ultimately supports is the latter. By providing a way for each user to
enter his or her own phone number into the system, the participants do not obtain
the means to contact each other outside of this particular context. If the phone-based
interaction is not satisfactory for some reason, it can end there. Nobody will
be required to move to another state or change his or her name. (Note that another
way people may increase the level of intimacy somewhat while protecting their
identities is by signing up for one of the many available free email services
using a false name. Email keeps the communication in the text domain, but allows
for more extended conversations, while still protecting the user s "real"
For legal reasons, the actual information about the phone numbers
associated with a particular call is store in the system database. This
precaution is necessary in case there is a need to subpoena telephone records.
The fact that each user must actually provide his or her phone number to the
system creates an interesting paradox. A recent survey of Internet users'
privacy concerns (Cranor, Reagle, and Ackerman, 1999) found that people are
especially reluctant to reveal their telephone numbers (11% would feel comfortable
revealing phone number, as compared to 76% for email address.) It is an open
question whether people feel more comfortable giving their phone number directly
to another person (via an instant message, for example) or to the system via
the AT&T Chat 'N Talk set-up screens.
Another variable that contributes to users' willingness to supply
information in an e-commerce context is the "trustworthiness" of the site.
(This is an e-commerce context, since users must enter credit card information
to initiate the call.) Trustworthiness is related to the navigability of a
site (Cheskin Research & Studio Archetype/Sapient, 1999). This turns out
to be an issue for services like AT&T Chat 'N Talk, which could either
be offered as a general-purpose communications program that could be used
with any chat room, or could be built in to particular chat room software.
It turns out that there are significant usability advantages in integrating
the functionality into the chat software, which, broadly speaking, are related
to "navigating" the application. These are explored below.
The Business and Technical Context
AT&T Chat 'N Talk was designed as a part of a suite of
products called AT&T Interactive Communications, which also includes AT&T
Click2Dial Conferencing, an internet-based conference call service. From a
business standpoint, these services are important for several reasons:
- These services give AT&T an initial presence as a communications
provider within a new "distribution" channel: AT&T is in a
position similar to Barnes & Noble in the on-line bookstore world. AT&T
is changing its image as a traditional telecommunications company. For that
reason, it is important for it to invent new services that work in the context
of the Internet. These services also provide another
opportunity for AT&T to generate minutes of use on existing infrastructure
(the voice network).
- These services introduce a new population of users to conferencing
services: AT&T Click2Dial Conferencing was conceived as a consumer service,
and has been promoted for use by consumers for personal communications on
holidays and for special occasions. AT&T Chat 'N Talk also provides users with conferencing
- These services contribute to a long-term vision of integrated communications
services that could include universal messaging services, instant messaging,
directory services, and the like. These integrated communications services
will involve voice telephony as well as Internet-based communication modes.
The technology that supports AT&T Chat 'N Talk is similar
to what international call-back services use. With those services, the users
call in to a special number, hang up, and are immediately called back by the
service, at which point they will be connected to the party they want to call.
The main difference between such services and the AT&T
Interactive Communications services is that the Internet replaces that initial
phone call as the means by which caller location and called party information
are supplied. The Internet can then be used to collect billing information
and provide the user with call status information. In addition, the use of the
Internet enables capabilities
like creating a private text-chat session only for people who are connected
to the call, or supporting "social surfing" for those who are connected
(a "leader" browses to a web site; the site is displayed on all
the other users' browsers).
Whereas services like AT&T Click2Dial Conferencing are,
at the simplest level, examples of services that extend what can be done without
involving the Internet (all major telecommunications companies have offered
conference calling services for years); services like AT&T Chat 'N Talk
are uniquely suited to the world of the Internet.
Chat is an Internet phenomenon. Of course, there are 900-number
services where people can have related experiences of talking to people they
haven't met before, and there are probably ways to have private "side
conferences" with many of them. But the range of topics is much smaller,
and the cost of participating is much greater. In addition, the initial level
of intimacy required is greater, since voice communication is involved. In
contrast to 900-number services, a large variety of chat topics is offered
on most portal sites, and users may participate for free (over the cost of
an Internet connection), at whatever level they want.
According to some estimates, between 6.5% and 21% of
the on-line population are regular users of chat rooms; up to 32% use chat occasionally
(Card, McAteer, and Rubin, 1998; IDC, 1998). This indicates that there is a
relatively small market for services like AT&T Chat 'N Talk at this time.
But this application is one that could readily be extended to other contexts,
such as Instant Messaging. One of the challenges of developing
services for the Internet is guessing right in a fast-moving environment. At
the time AT&T Chat 'N Talk was conceived and developed, Chat had a well-established
base compared to Instant Message services, which were just beginning to appear
on the Internet.
One of the lessons we have learned from our experience with
AT&T Chat 'N Talk is the importance of integrating the call functionality
into any other applications where it might be used. The remainder of this
paper discusses the details of how a context-independent version of the service
differs from an integrated one from the user's point of view.
Anonymous Voice Chat Breaks User Models of Initiating Communication Events
Across different communication domains, users experiences
with initiating communication events is similar: Using a context-appropriate
address, the initiator of the communication contacts the other party. This typical
model of initiating communication events holds true in the telephone domain,
the email domain, and the chat domain. In the telephone domain, the context-appropriate
address is the telephone number. In the email domain, it is the email address;
and in chat, the address is the chat handle, which allows a person to address
comments to a particular participant within the chat room, or to send a private
message. Of course, in each case, there is an implicit assumption that the "called"
party has given the "caller" permission to contact him or her, either
by explicitly providing the address, or by listing him or herself in a public
directory, which allows the caller to find the address using an independent
piece of information such as a name.
In this typical model of communication,
the initiator is more or less in "control" of the communication session. The
caller sends a message to initiate the session, the called party is alerted
that the communication is there (via a new mail appearing in the mail box,
an private message box popping up on the screen, or by the phone ringing)
and may refuse to engage (by not responding to the email or private message,
or by not answering the phone). Figure 2 displays the call flow of a typical
Figure 2: Initiating a Typical Phone Call
In the chat room scenario participants are reluctant
to give out their phone numbers. Because of this, a service like AT&T
Chat 'N Talk can protect privacy only by violating the typical model of
events (described above) in the following ways:
- The initiator does not have access to the context-appropriate
address (phone number), since the "called" party does not wish
to provide his or her number, and the caller cannot independently obtain
the phone number (since, even though many chat services include directories
or the ability to look at another user's profile, phone information is unlikely
to be included there.)
- The first step in establishing the session is inviting the
"called party" to participate.
- Each party is required to supply his or her context-appropriate
address to an independent "agent" (i.e., the phone network).
- Since the addressing takes place indirectly (the middle
contacts the ends), another variable is needed to make the agent tie the correct
ends together, so a "session identifier" or "access code" must be created
and used by both parties to the call. Thus, the access code must be provided
to both parties and used to communicate with the service.
- By modifying the order of establishing the session (caller
requests, recipient agrees, calls established in both directions and bridged),
the call flow introduces an element of surprise for the "calling" party: at
the end of this sequence of events, both the called and the caller s phone
will ring. Figure 3 displays a generic call flow for an AT&T Chat 'N
Figure 3: AT&T Chat 'N Talk Flow
Although this call-flow logic is required to establish an AT&T
Chat 'N Talk call, the context in which it is initiated can make all the difference
from the user perspective. In the version of the service that is independent
of a particular chat provider, the user must complete all of the above steps,
including obtaining the session identifier and communicating it to the "called"
party. Communication about the call set up must take place as messages sent
within the chat room (or instant messages associated with the chat client).
In a version of the service that integrates more tightly with the chat client,
much of the complexity of the flow could be hidden from the users, greatly simplifying
the call flows. These issues are discussed in more detail in the next section.
AT&T Chat 'N Talk Usability Challenges
The major usability issues for the AT&T Chat 'N Talk service surround
the violations of the typical model of initiating communication events. The
contrast between initiating a typical phone call and initiating an AT&T
Chat 'N Talk phone call highlights these usability challenges. Solutions to
these usability challenges are described below.
Independent AT&T Chat 'N Talk User Experience
When the service is independent of the chat client, a chat room has
a link that simply opens a browser to a web page that can trigger the call.
The browser runs separately and independently of that chat room. This maximizes
the complexity of the call set up, since important information about the call
(the session identifier used to bridge the two endpoints) must be communicated
between the participants, most likely through an instant message in the chat
software. Figure 4 displays the call flow for an AT&T Chat 'N Talk call
from both participants perspectives.
- The Host accesses a page allowing him to place a call. Access may be
via a link within the chat client or via the AT&T Chat 'N Talk home
- The Host enters & submits his telephone number and billing information
(i.e., credit card number and expiration date).
- The Host receives an Access Code.
- The Host sends this Access Code to his friend (perhaps privately via
a private chat room or instant message).
- The friend accesses the web site that is independent of the chat site,
and selects the option that will allow her to receive a call.
- The friend receives the Access Code from the Host and then enters &
submits her telephone number and the Access Code.
- Both parties are informed that the service is adding the other to the
call; the Host s phone rings and he answers; the friend s phone rings
and she answers.
Figure 4: AT&T Chat 'N Talk call flow for the version of the service
that is independent of a particular chat provider.
User Experience for Integrated AT&T Chat 'N Talk
When AT&T Chat 'N Talk is tightly coupled with the chat client,
the chat room integrates within the chat environment itself the ability to support
both text-based and voice-based anonymous conversations. This integration facilitates
the identification of individuals and the initiation of both kinds of conversation,
since the person initiating the voice chat can use the other user's chat handle
to initiate both the text and phone-based conversations, as described below.
- The Host presses a button (labeled "Phone" or "AT&T Chat 'N Talk")
on the chat client.
- The Host enters his telephone number and billing information (i.e.,
credit card number and expiration date).
- The Host enters the chat name of his friend.
- The Host informs his friend to click on the Phone button within her
chat client (perhaps privately via a private chat room or instant message).
- The friend clicks on the Phone button.
- The friend enters & submits her telephone number.
- Both parties are informed that the service is adding the other to the
call; the Host s phone rings and he answers; the friend s phone rings
and she answers.
The tight integration allows the Host to identify his friend by her
chat name. He does not need to receive an "access code" from the service and
then pass that code to his friend; she, in turn, does not need to receive that
access code from the Host and submit it back to the service. Tight integration
allows identification via an anonymous alias (the chat name) and maintains the
mood of anonymity in the transition from text to voice. Users can do this within
a chat room interface no separate browser window is required.
Usability Issues: Independent vs. Tightly Integrated AT&T Chat 'N Talk
There are two main usability problems with the independent call flow
that tight integration resolves:
- The cost of leaving the chat environment to enter calling and charging
information is high. The user is forced to confront multiple applications
and must move information across those applications. Specifically, obtaining
and communicating the access code is difficult, since many chat clients
have limited ability to accept cut and paste information. Depending on
how the host transfers the access code to the participant, they may have
an instant message or private chat room visible in addition to the main
chat window. In our initial design for the service, we displayed the URL
for the web site and the access code on two lines. When the Host tried
to copy the information into the messaging context, only one line would
be copied, and often the user did not realize that important information
had been omitted. Even though we solved this problem by having the host
send the other caller to the web site at an earlier point in the process,
there were still problems with this step. In addition, the large number
of relevant windows (at least 2, and often 3 or 4, depending on the chat
client) on the screen made it difficult to manage navigating the task.
- This complicated interaction takes quite a bit of time. In usability
tests conducted on an earlier version of the software, it was not unusual
for the host to take 3-5 minutes to complete the steps between asking
the participant if he or she wanted to talk and coming back to the participant
with the access code. Participants spontaneously sent messages to determine
if the host was still there. Given the tenuousness of the interaction,
the fact that the Host was off setting up the call for several minutes
while the other party waited led us to predict that the number of actual
call completions would be unacceptably small.
Since users may feel tentative about taking this next step toward intimacy,
these problems may seriously affect the rate of use of the service.
By keeping the user's focus within
the chat application and integrating the technology that allows the two true
identities to be hidden and managed by the system, the complexity of establishing
the call is significantly reduced.
One other feature has been added to the service to support repeated users.
In its initial release, AT&T Chat 'N Talk was viewed as a "per call"
service, and required the user to enter a credit card number each time they
placed a call. Users may now enter their credit card number and password-protect
it, so that each time they place a call, they need enter only the password,
not the phone number and credit card.
AT&T Chat 'N Talk is an example of how the Internet stimulates
the need for new and different kinds of communication services. It enriches
the anonymous chat experience by allowing people to extend it into the voice
domain. Users can take a step closer to their chat acquaintances without revealing
all. AT&T s decision to work with chat software developers and chat room
providers is an important step in creating an integrated, usable service.
In addition to providing a usable service, the success of AT&T
Chat 'N Talk rests on the customers trust that their information will remain
private. Communication companies like AT&T carry with them a history of
trustworthiness. The Caller ID blocking and the lack of any part of the participant
or host phone numbers appearing on the credit card bill confirms the users
confidence that their calling information will be kept confidential. With services
like AT&T Chat 'N Talk in which private information is kept private, users
will be encouraged that they can evolve their internet relationships without
risking personal safety.
What remains to be seen is whether, once users understand that their
phone numbers will be kept private, they will in fact decide to take a step
toward the next level of intimacy. The availability of such services make it
possible to study the circumstances under which people may want to safely increase
their level of intimacy. With services like AT&T Chat 'N Talk, we can begin
to understand whether people move to more intimate communications media as soon
as they can do so "anonymously" or whether the special characteristics of text-based
chat make it, in some situations, the communications medium of choice.
In the age of Internet communications, the issues of privacy and trust
have technical and human components. Looking for solutions to these communications
issues is one of the most exciting areas of application development on the Internet
We would like to thank Nick Benimoff and Randy Pilc for their review
of this paper and thoughtful comments. We would also like to thank Brian Kurtz
for his hard work on the usability evaluation of the service during his summer
internship at AT&T Labs. Finally we would like to thank Justin Bird for
the colorful cartoon that appears in the paper.
Agre, P. & Rotenberg, M. (1997). Technology and Privacy:
The New Landscape. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Benimoff, N. I. & Whitten, W.B., II (1993). Human
factors issues in multimedia conferencing. In Proceedings of the Human Factors
in Telecommunications International Symposium (pp. 227-236). Heidelberg, Germany:
R.v. Decker s Verlag.
Card, D., McAteer, R., Rubin, R. (1998) Chat and Instant Messaging:
Matching Messaging Technologies to Diverging Site Applications. Jupiter Communications
Strategic Planning Services Report.
Cheskin Research & Studio Archetype/Sapient (1999) eCommerce
Trust Study. Published by Cheskin Research. Available online at http://www.studioarchetype.com/headlines/etrust_frameset.html
Cranor, L. & Reagle, J. (1997, September) Designing
a Social Protocol: Lessons Learned from the Platform for Privacy Preferences
Project. Proceedings of the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. Available
online at: http://www.research.att.com/~lorrie/pubs/dsp/dsp.html
Cranor, L., Reagle, J., Ackerman, M. (1999). Beyond Concern: Understanding
Net Users' Attitudes About Online Privacy. AT&T Labs-Research Technical
Report TR 99.4.3.
Davis, G. (1998, March): From POTS to PANS: Transforming Plain
Old Telephone Service to Pretty Awesome Network Services in the Age of the
Internet. In Proceedings of the Voice on the Net (VON)Conference, San Jose,
Dibbell, J. (1993). A Rape in Cyberspace. Village
Voice, 12/23/93. Available online at: http://www.levity.com/julian/bungle.html
Dibbell, J (1999). My Tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual
World, New York: Henry Holt & Company, Incorporated.
Dyson, E. (1997). Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital
Age. New York: Broadway Books.
Fussell, S. R. & Benimoff, N. I. (1995). Social and Cognitive
Processes in Interpersonal Communication: Implications for Advanced Telecommunications
Hafner, K. (1997, May). The Epic Saga of The Well:
The World s Most Influential Online Community (And It s Not AOL). Wired,
5.05. Available online at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.05/ff_well_pr.html
Hamman, R. (1999). The Online/Offline Dichotomy:
Debunking Some Myths about AOL Users and the Effects of Their Being Online
Upon Offline Friendships and Offline Community. Final draft version of MPhil
Thesis, Department of Communication Studies, University of Liverpool. Available
online at: http://www.socio.demon.co.uk/mphil/index.html
Johnson, S. (1997) Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms
the Way We Create and Communicate. San Francisco: HarperEdge.
Katz, J. & Aspden, P. (1997). Friendship Formation
In Cyberspace: Analysis of a National Survey of Users. Project Report
for The Markle Foundation. Available online at: http://www.markle.org
Katz, J. & Aspden, P. (1997). Cyberspace and
Social Community Development: Internet Use and Its Community Integration
Correlates. Project Report for The Markle Foundation. Available online
Kling, R (1996). Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts
and Social Choices. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler,
S., Mukophadyay, T. & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet Paradox: A Social
Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?
American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031. Available online at: http://homenet.andrew.cmu.edu/progress/research.html
Kraut, R. E., Scherlis, W., Patterson, M., Kiesler,
S. & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1998). Social Impact of the Internet What Does
It Mean? Communications of the ACM, 41(12), 21-22. Available online
Lin, D. & Loui, M. (1998). Taking the byte out of cookies:
privacy, consent, and the Web. Computers and Society, 39-51.
Meeks, B. N. Electronic Frontier: The privacy hoax. Communications
of the ACM 42, 2 (Feb. 1999), Pages 17 - 19
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on
the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Rheingold, H. (1998). Misunderstanding New Media.
Feed Magazine (online). Available online at: http://www.feedmag.com/essay/es102lofi.html
Rosenberg, S. (1998). Sad and lonely in cyberspace?
Why the new Net-depression study is something to get bummed about. Salon
Magazine (online). Available online at: http://www.salonmagazine.com/21st/rose/1998/09/03straight.html
Schneier, B. & Banisar, D. (1997). The Electronic Privacy
Papers: Documents on the Battle for Privacy in the Age of Surveillance.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schwartz, P. (1996, June) R-Tech: An Interview with
Albert Bressand. Wired, 4.06. Available online at: http://www.wired.com:80/wired/archive/4.06/rtech.html
|"AT&T Chat 'N Talk: Getting to Know You without Getting to Know All About You "
Thanks to our conference sponsors:
Thanks to our conference event sponsor:
Site Created: Dec. 12, 1998
Last Updated: June 10, 1999
Contact email@example.com with corrections.