Introduction

The DARPA Intelligent Collaboration and Visualization program (ICV) has the goal of developing the generation after next collaboration middleware and tools to enable military components and joint staff groups to enhance the effectiveness of collaborating problem solvers through:

The ICV program has funded a number of proposals for the development of collaborative technologies and has devoted a portion of the funds towards the establishment of evaluation metrics, methodologies and tools. Since the technologies developed are likely to be diverse, it seems appropriate to review the specific objectives of the program and use them as a basis for establishing the direction which the investigation of evaluation methods might take. The ICV program objectives are:
  1. Enable access via diverse portals, from hand-held through room-sized;
  2. Enable interoperability across diverse encoding formats, coordination and consistency protocols, and real-time services;
  3. Scale collaborations to 10 active contributors, 100 questioners, and 1000 observers;
  4. Reduce by an order of magnitude the time needed to generate collaborative applications;
  5. Enable real-time discovery of relevant collaborators and information within task context;
  6. Reduce by an order of magnitude the time to establish collaborative sessions across heterogeneous environments;
  7. Reduce by an order of magnitude the time to review collaborative sessions; and
  8. Improve task-based performance of collaborators by two orders of magnitude.
The effectiveness of each of the collaborative technologies is to be evaluated with respect to each of these objectives, when it is appropriate, and so ways of measuring the extent to which the objectives have been achieved must be developed. Objectives 1, 2 and 5 seem to require qualitative measures, whereas the remaining goals are amenable to quantitative measures. It is the task of the Evaluation Group to develop the metrics and evaluation methodology, and to develop, or guide the development of, specific tests and tools for achieving effective and economical evaluation.

The Evaluation Working Group and its Aims

The Evaluation Group comprises researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, MITRE, NIMA and NIST, with diverse backgrounds whose aims include defining and validating methods that any researcher in the collaborative computing research community can use to evaluate their own or other research products. This objective is further refined into a set of goals as follows:

  1. To develop, evaluate and validate metrics and methodology for evaluating collaborative tools.
  2. To provide reusable evaluation technology, such that research groups can assess their own progress.
  3. To apply DOD-relevant criteria, e.g., evaluate using scenarios drawn from:
  4. To define a vision that will drive collaborative computing research.


EWG/ICV Home